Legal Opinion
Creekmore v. Truist Bank
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 24, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00209Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division LEAANNE CREEKMORE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:24-cv-209 TRUIST BANK, Defendant. OPINION & ORDER In this Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) case, Plaintiff LeaAnne Creekmore alleges Defendant Truist Bank retaliated against her, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 2615, after she requested and subsequently took FMLA leave. Truist moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 63 (motion), 64 (memorandum). The Motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART because the plaintiff demonstrates genuine disputes about the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.