Legal Opinion

Brace v. Berdan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

I think there was error in the submission of this case to the jury. It appears that plaintiffs, through their agent, received a mortgage from Alexander R. McKenzie, covering his stock of goods, amounting to $7,500. There was due plaintiffs at the time $4,600, and there was testimony tending to show.that the mortgage was received as security for this sum, and for $2,900, •future advances to be made in goods to McKenzie. The •circuit judge charged the jury:

“It appears from the evidence here, and I think I may ,say to you that there is no contention about it, — it is conceded, — that the actual…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louden v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mason v. MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dummer v. SmedleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Simms v. RamseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Slattery v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API