Legal Opinion

Dummer v. Smedley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by William F. Dummer against Charles O. Smedley, receiver of the Gypsum Plaster & Stucco Company, and others, to foreclose a mortgage. From the decree entered, complainant, defendant Smedley, as receiver, and defendants Nancy M. Hinsdill and William L. Tyler, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage made by the Gypsum Plaster & Stucco Company to the complainant on October 4, 1892, on 120 acres of land in the township of Wyoming, Kent county, with the gypsum mines and mills thereon, to secure payment of $25,-000, with interest. The mortgage was recorded October *4685, 1892. A chattel mortgage covering the personal property about the mills was given as additional security.

It appears that, prior to 1891, the Union Mills Plaster Company, a corporation, had been engaged in business near Grand Rapids in the quarrying of plaster rock, and in the manufacture…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Au Sable River Boom Co. v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Showman v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Locust Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Merchants State Bank v. TuftsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Corn Belt Trust & Savings Bank of Belle Plaine v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Speer v. BordeleauColorado Court of Appeals · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API