Legal Opinion
Emrit v. Musk
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 23, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00071Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON . MEDFORD DIVISION RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Case No. 1:25-cv-00071-CL Plaintiff, V. OPINION AND ORDER ELON MUSK, VIVEK RAMASWAMY, . _ Speaker of the House MIKE JOHNSON, And the DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT ~ EFFICIENCY . Defendants. CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit, self-represented litigant, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Defendants Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, Speaker of _ the House Mike J ohnson, and the Department of Government Efficiency. For the reasons below, Plaintiff's…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.