United States v. Dynalectric Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIMPSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motion by defendants, Dynalectric Company (hereinafter “Dynalectric”) and G.W. Walther Ewalt, for permission to plead nolo contendere to the charges against them in this indictment pursuant to Rule 11(b), Fed.R.Crim.P.
In the alternative, Dynalectric and Ewalt would have this Court sever them from trial with nonmoving codefendant, Kenneth W. Seales, pursuant to Rule 14, Fed.R. Crim.P.
In considering whether to allow the moving defendants to plead nolo conten-dere, the Court must consider whether acceptance of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. American Bakeries CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968
- United States v. H & M, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- United States v. American Bakeries Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.