Legal Opinion
United States v. H & M, INC.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1982No. Crim. Nos. 82-00040-01, 82-00040-03 and 82-00040-04PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
565 F.Supp. 1 (1982)
UNITED STATES of America
v.
H & M, INC., Jack D. Murphy, William H. Quigley, Jr.
Crim. Nos. 82-00040-01, 82-00040-03 and 82-00040-04.
United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.
June 15, 1982.
Richard S. Rosenberg, Richard A. Small, Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.
Richard W. Cleckner, Cleckner & Fearen, Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of defendants, H & M, Inc., William H. Quigley, Jr. and Jack D. Murphy, to change their plea from not guilty to nolo contendere.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Standard Ultramarine & Color Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- United States v. H & M, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Seville Industrial MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- United States v. Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Dynalectric Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987