Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Iglesias

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 92-2437-CR, 92-2679-CRPublished

1DissentWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The purpose of bail is to assure the appearance of the accused when it is the accused's duty to appear to answer the criminal prosecution. Whitty v. State, 34 Wis. 2d 278, 286, 149 N.W.2d 557 (1967); Wis. Const. Art. I sec. 8(2). The majority today concludes that bail posted by third parties on behalf of a defendant may be applied to fines imposed at sentencing. Because bail is being used in this case for purposes for which it was not intended and is thus "excessive," and because its use in this manner will have a chilling effect upon a defendant's constitutional rights to pretrial release, I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. TroutmanOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. Thomas M. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API