Legal Opinion

Corwine v. Maracaibo Oil Exploration Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1959No. 41,184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal in an action instituted to recover damages resulting from pollution of plaintiff’s stock pond caused by escaping oil, salt water, and refuse from defendant’s adjoining oil lease operations. A verdict was returned and approved, and judgment for actual and punitive damages in favor of plaintiff was entered by the trial court. Defendant filed posttrial motions to set aside the general verdict and answers to special questions, to remit and reduce the actual and punitive damages, and for new trial. All of the foregoing motions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Banbery v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Krehbiel v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Phillips v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Joseph E. Newman, Also Known as J. E. Newman v. Everett Nelson and Geral J. BannonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Gano v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Jensen v. Sierra Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API