State v. Meadows
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLEY, Justice.
**743 This case requires the Court to consider whether Rule 10(a)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure precludes appellate review of sentencing arguments not raised before the sentencing court.
**744 We conclude that defendant waived her Eighth Amendment arguments by failing to raise them before the sentencing court; defendant's nonconstitutional sentencing issues were preserved for appellate review despite her failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection, but are nonetheless meritless. Accordingly, we modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. As…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. TiradoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BursellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. DeJesusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.