Legal Opinion
Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 25, 2013No. 11 Civ. 3388(JMF)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs, self-described “promoters of democracy in China through their writings, publications and reporting of pro-democracy events,” claim in this suit that the People’s Republic of China and Baidu.com Inc. (“Baidu”), a Chinese Internet search engine service,1 have conspired to prevent their “pro-democracy political speech” from appearing in Baidu’s search engine results. (Compl. ¶¶ 7-8, 10-12, 14).2 Whatever the merits of their claims, the question presented here is whether Defendants have been properly served with the Complaint, as China…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State of New York and Erin D. Crotty v. Kevan M. Green and Polymer Applications, Inc., Docket No. 04-4070-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Dickerson Ex Rel. Davison v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jian Zhang v. Baidu.com Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Pablo Star Ltd. v. Welsh GovernmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Jian Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- (Asia) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Actava TV, Inc. v. Joint Stock Company "Channel One Russia Worldwide"District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.