Legal Opinion
(Asia) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 1, 2018No. B272170PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmon, P.J.
*120This appeal concerns an aborted international business deal between Changzhou SinoType Technology Company, Ltd. (SinoType), a Chinese company, and Rockefeller Technology Investments (Asia) VII (Rockefeller Asia), an American investment *817partnership. When the relationship between the two entities soured, Rockefeller Asia pursued contractual arbitration against SinoType in Los Angeles. SinoType did not appear or participate in the arbitration proceeding, and the arbitrator entered a default award in excess of $414 million against it. The award was confirmed and judgment entered, again at a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Water Splash, Inc. v. MenonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified On Schedule "A"District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Rockefeller Technology etc. v. Changzhou SinoType Technology etc.California Supreme Court · 2020