Legal Opinion
State v. Lanam
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 10, 1990No. C8-89-95Published
1Opinion of the Court
459 N.W.2d 656 (1990)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
David G. LANAM, Appellant.
No. C8-89-95.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 10, 1990.
John Stuart, State Public Defender, Mark F. Anderson, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Harris Darling, Nobles County Atty., Worthington, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
KEITH, Justice.
Defendant, David G. Lanam, was found guilty by a district court jury of two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.