In Re Hudson
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. LITTLEFIELD, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
In a prior Memorandum-Decision and Order, entered May 16, 2006, the court found Paul S. Hudson (“Hudson”) to be a prevailing party and, thus, entitled to recover attorney’s fees pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7430 from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with his claim objection, despite Hudson’s status as a pro se attorney litigant. In re Hudson, 345 B.R. 477 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.2006), appeal docketed, No. 1:06-cv-00763 (N.D.N.Y. June 19, 2006). 1 The court agreed with the Fifth Circuit that a litigant attorney’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Isadore Cassuto and Thalia Cassuto, Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Mary Williams Cazalas v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Cassuto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- In Re HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kovacs v. United States (In Re Kovacs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- US DEPT. OF JUSTICE, TAX DIV. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States Department of Justice, Tax Division v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Billybey Marina Services, LLC v. Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- CLST Enterprises, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025