Legal Opinion
Denso Corporation v. Mahmoud A. Dweib
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided February 26, 2013No. 14-12-00291-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.
This is the consolidated appeal of three products liability cases involving collisions allegedly caused by the unintended acceleration of Toyota vehicles. In three issues, appellant DENSO Corporation (DENSO Japan) complains of the trial court’s denial of its special appearances. We reverse the trial court’s order denying DENSO Japan’s special appearances and remand with instructions to dismiss the claims against DENSO Japan for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Background
Appellees filed lawsuits against DENSO Japan and others for injuries sustained when engine…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michael Dodd and 3D Global Solutions, Inc. v. Brian J. Savino, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Parex Resources, Inc. and Ramshorn International Limited v. ERG Resources, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Semperit Technische Produkte Gesellschaft M.B.H. v. Hennessy ex rel. SmithersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Bautista v. Trinidad Drilling Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Gulf Coast International, L.L.C. v. the Research Corporation of the University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.