Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Bull Dog Auto Fire Insurance v. Bland
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 26, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Certiorari. A judgment in favor of George H. Andrews, and against this relator, was affirmed by the Kansas City Court of Appeals, upon the second appeal in the cause, and it is insisted that the rulings made therein are in conflict with controlling decisions of this court.
The suit was one upon a policy of insurance of an automobile against loss by fire and theft. The facts and the issues made by the pleadings are set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, upon the first appeal, Andrews v. Bull Dog Auto Assn., 258 S.W. 714; and the statement thereof, by reference, is made part of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Combs v. Hannibal Savings & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- New Jersey Mutual Life Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Fulbright v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Toler v. Missouri Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Western Cas. & Sur. Co. of Fort Scott v. WunderlichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bennett v. National Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.