Legal Opinion

Cancellieri v. De Modica

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 4, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kolovsky, J. S. C.

Trial of the above-entitled automobile negligence ease resulted in verdicts of “no cause for action” on both the main case and the counterclaim. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed a petition, on which an order to show cause issued, by which plaintiffs sought to have Donald V. Moran, Thomas Sherman, Matthew Vallone, Robert J. Alberque, and State Parm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter called “respondents”) adjudged guilty of a criminal contempt of court for

*602“abuse of process and for allegedly examining and obtaining by fraud, deceit and misrepresentation, confidential…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. McCann v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Turner v. AlbinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. ShumakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cancellieri v. De ModicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API