Legal Opinion

Cammer v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1956No. 110PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

18 U. S. C. § 401 (2) empowers a court of the United States to punish as contempt “Misbehavior of any of its *400officers in their official transactions . ...” 1 Petitioner, a lawyer, sent a questionnaire to a District of Columbia grand jury. For this, the District Court found petitioner guilty of contempt and fined him $100. 122 F. Supp. 388. In so doing the court held that within the meaning of the statute petitioner was one “of its officers” and that sending the questionnaire was “misbehavior” in an “official transaction.” The Court of Appeals affirmed, Circuit Judge Fahy dissenting. 96 U. S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API