Legal Opinion

State v. Heidelberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1944No. 33,589PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Defendant was convicted in Hennepin county of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction, and challenges the venue and part of the charge.

Defendant lived in Hennepin county and was employed in that part of the Northern Pump Company’s plant which lies in Anoka county. His duties were to assist and advise company employes with reference to various personal problems, among others traffic violations, in order to prevent loss of time from their work. The employes either gave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  4. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KlosterboerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
  3. State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
  4. State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
  5. State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API