Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson, A21-1360, Supreme Court, September 13, 2023

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 2023No. A211360Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A21-1360 Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: September 13, 2023 Office of Appellate Courts Raeleen Kay Johnson, Appellant. Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Ed Stockmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and Rachel v. Cornelius, Waseca County Attorney, Waseca, Minnesota, for respondent. Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Jenna Yauch-Erickson, Benjamin J. Butler, Assistant Public Defenders, Saint Paul, Minnesota for appellant. SY LLA BU S 1. Because the “informs” element of the offense…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas C. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State v. TscheuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. United States v. Elmer Peter Black CloudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API