Legal Opinion

City of Hialeah v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1936No. 7983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The appellees recovered judgment against the appellant on certain past-due bonds and interest coupons. The pleas on which the trial was had were that the writings sued on were not the deeds of the defendant-appellant and that the plaintiffsappellees were not at the time of the filing of the suit or the pleas the owners, holders, or bearers in any capacity of said writings. The plaintiffs alleged in the declaration that they were a Bondholders Protective Committee, and exhibited the agreement by which bonds issued by the defendant were to be deposited with them, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. McCallum v. DriggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. City of Coral Gables v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  5. Durham v. MeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Hialeah v. United States ex rel. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  2. Penn-Florida Hotels Corp. v. Atlantic Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API