Legal Opinion
Nakoff v. Fairview Gen. Hosp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1996No. 1994-1626PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 254.] NAKOFF, APPELLANT, v. FAIRVIEW GENERAL HOSPITAL; ESSIG ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Nakoff v. Fairview Gen. Hosp.,
1996-Ohio-159.] Civil procedure—Trial court has broad discretion when imposing discovery sanctions—Reviewing court shall review these rulings only for an abuse of discretion. A trial court has broad discretion when imposing discovery sanctions. A reviewing court shall review these rulings only for an abuse of discretion. (No. 94-1626—Submitted November 14, 1995—Decided March 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Stinson v. EnglandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Di v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.