Legal Opinion
Crommelin v. Finn
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffebnan, J.
This case is submitted on an agreed statement of facts. The action is in ejectment for the recovery of. two unimproved lots located in what is known as the outside tax. district in the city of Saratoga Springs. Section 3 of the charter of the city (Laws of 1916, chap. 229, amdg. Laws of 1915, chap. 229) divides the city into three tax districts to be known as the “ city tax district,” the “ inside tax district,” and the “ outside tax district.” The lots in question are designated upon the official tax map as section 10, block D, lot 16, and section 11, block C, lot 2. The answer, in addition…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Merritt v. . Village of PortchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Joslyn v. . RockwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People v. . HagadornNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Bryan v. . McGurkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Thompson v. . BurhansNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Crommelin v. FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Helterline v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- United States Hotel Co. v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936