Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 2018No. 18-CV-2921 (JMF); 18-CV-5025 (JMF)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION...773

BACKGROUND...775

LEGAL STANDARDS...780

DISCUSSION...780

A. Standing...781

1. Injury-in-Fact...781

2. Traceability...785

3. NGO Plaintiffs' Standing...788

B. The Political Question Doctrine...790

C. The Administrative Procedure Act...793

D. The Enumeration Clause...799

E. The Equal Protection Claim...806

CONCLUSION...811

INTRODUCTION

The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution provides that "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective Numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State."…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Amadei v. NielsenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Nat'l Ass'n v. Bureau of the CensusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. State v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API