Legal Opinion

Lickteig v. Iowa Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1984No. 83-395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

When the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) routed a new highway over property plaintiff Dennis Lickteig was leasing, he became entitled to relocation assistance benefits pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 316 (1981). In this proceeding involving judicial review of agency action, plaintiff contends that he is entitled to substantially greater benefits than the DOT awarded. The district court held a plenary evidentia-ry hearing, then found that plaintiff was not entitled to greater benefits than he had been offered by the DOT. We affirm.

The evidence presented by plaintiff, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Hoffman v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Wilson v. FentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Women Aware v. ReagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Suss v. SchammelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Black v. University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Medco Behavioral Care Corp. of Iowa v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Humiston Grain Co. v. Rowley Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Goodwin v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API