Legal Opinion

Suss v. Schammel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1985No. 84-566PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This controversy arose after a farm was sold by its owner to one of his sons. Both the buyer and seller are deceased and the dispute is between the father’s other children and the son’s widow. On the widow’s petition the trial court directed completion of the sale and conveyance of title. Defendants’ cross-appeal is from that determination. The widow’s additional claims for actual and punitive damages were allowed by a jury but were set aside on defendants’ post-trial motion. That ruling is the subject of plaintiff’s appeal. We affirm on both appeals.

Howard J. Suss,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Inghram Ex Rel. Inghram v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Winter v. Honeggers'& Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Schiltz v. Cullen-Schiltz & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Lara v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Hockenberg Equipment Co. v. Hockenberg's Equipment & Supply Co. of Des Moines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Huber v. HoveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation FundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API