Legal Opinion

United States v. Queen

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1900No. 3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Petition of Matthew H. Chadwick, Informer.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The petitioner avers that he furnished original information concerning certain frauds committed by the defendants upon the customs revenue, that suit was brought upon this information, and recovery had by the government, and therefore that he is entitled to compensation, under section 4 of the act of 1874 (1 Supp. Rev. St. [2d Ed.] p. 32). He asks the court to examine and determine the validity of his claim for compensation, and also to certify the value of his services to the secretary of the treasury, under the first paragraph of section 6 of the same statute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1883
  2. Ex parte RiebelingDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. In re GhazalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1908
  3. In re GhazalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API