Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 207, Calendar No. 36,164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s suit on the ground that the declaration did not state a cause of action. Following the hearing of ■this motion plaintiff filed an amended bill of particulars. Thereafter defendant again moved to dismiss, and, among other reasons, set forth the following :

“For the reason that, as to plaintiff’s alleged agreement pertaining to one Osborne, said declaration and bill of particulars, as amended, set forth no facts which show such agreement, nor the compensation, if any, to be received by said plaintiff for his services, nor any loss resulting to said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Heiser v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Krueger v. Le BlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API