Legal Opinion

Strickler v. Bell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAKIN, Judge.

Mervin K. and Myra D. Strickler appeal from an order dismissing their legal malpractice complaifit with prejudice. We affirm.

The underlying malpractice action derives from appellees’ alleged negligent failure to commence a legal action on behalf of appellants within the applicable statute of limitations; appellants hired appellees in the late 1970’s to recover proceeds from the sale of timber wrongfully harvested from their land. Part of them claim was dismissed as untimely filed and barred by the running of the statute of limitations. Appellants’ remaining claims proceeded to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Doyle v. TesauroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Margolis v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Neer v. Niedermeyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API