Shaw v. Imperial Mutual Life and Benefit Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
The record herein includes three appeals. To avoid confusion the parties will be denominated as “plaintiff” and “defendant”, and the appeals will be considered in the following order: (1) Appeal by defendant from a judgment entered on findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1533 on an insurance policy issued to one James Manning, father of plaintiff. (2) Appeal by plaintiff from the same judgment. (3) Appeal by plaintiff from an order made after judgment striking her cost bill.
Appeal No. 1.
The defendant is a • mutual life and benefit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Travelers Insurance v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- O'Connor v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Pedrotti v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Shotwell v. BloomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Podlasky v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Rice v. California-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- O'Mara v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.