Legal Opinion
Crocco v. Advance Stores Co. Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2006No. 3:04CV1608(JCH)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. Nos. 37, 38, & 41]
HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Denise D. Crocco (“Croc-co”), asserts claims against her former employer, Advance Stores Co. Inc. (“Advance”); her former supervisor at Advance, David Logue (“Logue”); another Advance employee, Joseph S. Glorioso (“Glorioso”); the City of Waterbury; and Waterbury police officer Daniel C. Stanton (“Stanton”). Crocco asserts claims against Advance for “Discriminatory Terms, Conditions, and Privileges of Employment” in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l), and…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deanda v. HicksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Holmes v. Town of East LymeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Pc v. Connecticut Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Apatow v. StratfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Belton v. WydraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.