Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venture

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. S-99-438Published

1DissentHendry, C.J.

Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a new trial on damages is warranted in this case, I respectfully dissent.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

I agree with the majority that an abuse of discretion standard is the proper standard regarding a motion for new trial. However, I disagree with the majority’s application of the abuse of discretion standard insofar as the majority asserts that this court must view the facts on appeal in the light most favorable to the trial court’s decision. I believe this court’s established precedent requires that we view the facts in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Santo Scala v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API