Legal Opinion
Tandy Computer Leasing v. DeMarco
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 4, 1989No. 1493PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
Appellant, Tandy Computer Leasing (“Tandy”) and appellee John DeMarco (“DeMarco”) entered into an agreement dated September 15, 1981 for the lease of certain computer equipment and accessories. Tandy maintains a place of business in Texas and the lease by its own terms was deemed made there. The equipment was shipped from Texas to DeMarco, who is a Pennsylvania resident and who conducts no business in Texas. After mailing several payments on the lease to Tandy in Texas, DeMarco returned the equipment to Tandy and failed to make further payments.
Tandy sued DeMarco in Texas for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bancorp Group, Inc. v. Pirgos, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth Capital Funding, Inc. v. Franklin Square HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Frontier Leasing Corp. v. ShahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Capstone Capital Group v. Alexander Perry, IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- National Union Fire Insurance v. NicholasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.