Legal Opinion

Frontier Leasing Corp. v. Shah

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants Asif Shah, both as an individual and doing business under the name of Lillen’s Restaurant, appeal from the September 6, 2005, Order denying appellants’ Petition for Rule to Show Cause Why Judgment Should Not Be Stricken or Opened.

¶ 2 The underlying action arose from the leasing of an ATM machine to Shah by a third-party lessor who, in turn, assigned its rights under the lease to appellee Frontier Leasing. The ATM lease term lasted for 60 months and required Shah to pay monthly rent in the amount of $249. Record, No. 7, Petition for Rule to Show Cause, Exb.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. KNICKERBOCKER RUSSELL CO., INC. v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Alpine Equipment v. U.S. Sewer and DrainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Arro Consulting, Inc. v. Bennett, Brewer & Assoc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Continental Machinery Co. v. Korn, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API