Legal Opinion

People v. Ireland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision *980and remitted this matter to Oneida County Court to make findings of fact and to determine whether defendant was present at the in-chambers Sandoval hearing (People v Ireland, 222 AD2d 1075). The court concluded, based upon the testimony of the Trial Judge, that defendant was present at the Sandoval conference. Although the testimony of the Trial Judge was disputed, the record supports the hearing court’s conclusion that defendant was present (see, People v Wiggins, 227 AD2d 918; People v Terry, 225 AD2d 1058).

Defendant contends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AguileraNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. IrelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API