Legal Opinion

People v. Torres

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1992PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

In People v Mullen (44 NY2d 1), the Court held that defendant’s right to be present at all material stages of trial was not violated when a hearing on a sworn juror’s possible disqualification was held in defendant’s absence. Although in People v Darby (75 NY2d 449, 453) we acknowledged that “greater safeguards may be desirable or even eventually held to be required depending on some future particular fact pattern,” the facts of this case do not warrant that concern. Here, the entire inquiry of the juror…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BufordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Angelo Torres v. Daniel Senkowski, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. People v. AguileraNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API