United States v. Millard Robert Beasley, Defendnat-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
McCREE, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I believe that the majority opinion has correctly resolved all but the final issue it discusses. However, in discussing appellant’s second contention, I would not characterize the missing laboratory technician’s function as involving the performance of a test. If he had performed a test the issues of which were relevant, it would have been error not to have required him to testify because the test results would constitute an assertion,, verbal or otherwise, about a matter material in the litigation and evidence thereof would be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Patrick Ralph Rizzo A/K/A Alfred Dale RosenheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.