Arledge v. SCHERER FREIGHT LINES, INC.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
Two questions are raised by appellant. They are:
1. Did not the plaintiff establish a cause of action under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur ?
2. Did not plaintiff’s evidence establish that the defendant was negligent in handling the fire and in reporting it to the fire department?
“Although, as a general rule, the mere occurrence of a fire with resultant injuries does not raise a presumption of negligence either in the kindling or the management of the fire, and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is ordinarily held inapplicable at least in other than exceptional instances, the doctrine [of res…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Kapros v. Pierce Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Dodge v. McFallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Texas Hotel Co. of Longview v. CosbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Meurer v. ITT General ControlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Schwalbach v. Antigo Electric & Gas, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Ripon CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Foerster v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.