Legal Opinion

Dean v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 3, 1997No. 96-4005PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

A loser at commercial or labor arbitration might very well wish to circumvent the arbiter’s decision and head unencumbered for the courts. But if final and binding arbitration is to serve its purpose, it must be just that—• final and binding. Arbitration would otherwise become little more than a procedural detour, without ultimate significance.

Companies and unions in their collective bargaining agreements regularly assent to submitting their disputes to final and binding arbitration. If the losing party refuses to abide by the arbiter’s award, the victor may press for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Fort Hill Builders, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co., Carl L. DwormanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. West Rock Lodge No. 2120 v. Geometric Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lowell E. Harter and Doretta Harter v. Iowa Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Generica Limited v. Pharmaceutical Basics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Butler Manufacturing Company v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local 2629, United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. CPR Management SA v. Devon Park Bioventures LPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  5. Midwest Generation EME, LLC v. Continuum Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API