Legal Opinion

Pottorf v. Clark

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1985No. 3-84-0548PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that they were injured as the result of defendants’ negligence. Plaintiffs did not comply with defendants’ discovery requests. On November 1, 1982, the trial court allowed defendant Clark’s motion for discovery sanctions. (87 Ill. 2d R. 219.) The court’s order provided that if plaintiffs failed to comply with discovery requests before November 15, 1982, the complaint as against each defendant would automatically be dismissed.

On March 21, 1983, plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider, which the trial court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Subsequently,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Scott v. SilversteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Oak Brook Bank v. Citation Cycle Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. La Vida, Inc. v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Bailey v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Cohen v. Sterling Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Madison Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Nelson v. United Airlines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. People v. GuzikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Prairie Material Sales, Inc. v. White Diamond, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Spizzo v. LangmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API