Legal Opinion

Beemer v. Hughes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1914No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Clare; Dodds, J. Bill by Oliver Beemer against Ellis Hughes and others for specific performance and an accounting. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The important facts which resulted in the present controversy are stated in the Opinion of the circuit judge, as follows:

“The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for the purpose of compelling the conveyance to complainant, by the defendants Elmer and Ellis Hughes, of two pieces of real estate situate in lot 6, block 1, and by the defendant Ellis Hughes one piece in lot 5 of said block, all in the city of Harrison. The time and circumstances of dealings by which the legal title to these three pieces of land became vested in the defendants mark them as three entirely distinct and separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Niagara Falls Brewing Co. v. WallMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ryerson v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kinyon v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Chapman v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maurer v. Greening Nursery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Atkinson v. AkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sponholz v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Price v. MarcusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Rigo v. DeGutisMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API