Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1938No. 5936Published

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs sued defendant in the District Court of Salt Lake County on a promissory note and recovered judgment. Defendant appeals. The note, dated October 9, 1933, is for the sum of $600.00 payable $200.00 per year with interest payable semi-annually at the rate of 6% per annum from date until paid. The maker also agreed to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee. The note, which was signed and delivered by appellant, included the following provisions:

“The holders shall have the right to declare this note due and payable for default in payment of interest * * * It is also understood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Novak v. LovinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Daugherty v. PreuittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Kelly v. EggersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Miller v. SlaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API