Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Eggers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The court at Special Term refused to strike out, under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, certain defenses as insufficient in law in an action on a demand promissory note in the sum of $5,000, which note was accompanied by collateral deposited as security for its payment.

The first defense alleged sets out that the plaintiff is not a bona fide holder and owner of the note and that it was not presented and demand made for payment. If plaintiff is not a bona fide holder of the note the effect of this situation is to render the note subject to such defenses as are available against an…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. EggersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. County Trust Co. v. MaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Thompson v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API