Legal Opinion

State v. Mahoney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1992No. C89-11-36711; CA A65260Published

1Opinion of the Court

838 P.2d 1100 (1992)

115 Or. App. 440

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Dennis Dal MAHONEY, Appellant.

C89-11-36711; CA A65260.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 30, 1991.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Barry L. Adamson, Lake Oswego, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Roger Hennagin and Hennagin & Shonkwiler, Lake Oswego.

Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent.

David Paul and Merten & Associates, Portland, filed a brief amicus curiae for Lorraine Robertson.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

RICHARDSON, Presiding…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. LindslyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API