Legal Opinion
United States v. Nacrelli
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-2460PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
This is a petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate in accordance with Local Rule 7 of this Court. The Magistrate issued a report and recommended that the petition be denied. The petitioner filed objections to the report of the Magistrate, and the matter is therefore now before this Court.
Local Rule 7(IV)(b) provides that when a party has filed objections to a Magistrate’s report, “[a] judge shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John Paul Masters, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. John C. Winston, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson-Allen v. Crown Leasing Corp. (In Re Johnson-Allen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bragan v. MorganDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992