Bragan v. Morgan
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.
Jeris Bragan has petitioned this Court for the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging, inter alia, that the State violated the dictates of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972), by failing to disclose a plea agreement between the State and the State’s key witness, and by knowingly misleading the defense counsel and the jury through the use of perjured or inaccurate testimony at trial. For the reasons stated below, the Court…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections Derald Kerby, Warden, Central New Mexico Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Jeris E. Bragan v. David Poindexter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Austin v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996