Legal Opinion
Switzer v. Marzall
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 2, 1951No. Civ. No. 597-49PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
The question before the Court is whether it has jurisdiction to entertain defendant’s “Motion to Obtain Relief from Decree.”
Briefly, the chronology of this case is as follows:
December 13, 1950, the decree authorizing issuance to plaintiff of letters patent was signed.
January 30, 1951, defendant filed his motion for relief from the decree on the ground of newly discovered evidence (an alleged anticipation by the prior art, of which defendant was ignorant at the time of trial) under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
February 2, the Court approved a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Keyser v. FarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Daniels v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wiggins v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Aretz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1978
- Potts v. CattertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- In Re Aztec Supply Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- DeLee v. School District Number 3District Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.