Legal Opinion

A. J. Armstrong Co. v. Hufstedler

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1965No. 7635PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

Douglas E. Beery died pendente lite, and his .widow .and sole heir at law, Wilma L. Beery, was substituted, over her objection, as a party defendant for her husband “as his personal representative and sole heir at law.” She has appealed from a money judgment against her “as personal representative and sole surviving heir at law of Douglas E. Beery.”

' Our decision turns on whether the decedent’s personal representative is an indispensable party to a continuation of the case. It is fundamental that a pending action cannot be prosecuted after the death of a party defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keirsey v. HirschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. C. De Baca v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Romero v. HopewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Smith v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. McAndrews v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fox v. NickNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Stephen v. PhillipsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Linch v. Northport Irrigation DistrictNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Carbajal v. FalkDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API