Legal Opinion
State v. Manghan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 10, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
126 N.J. Super. 162 (1973)
313 A.2d 225
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT MANGHAN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 10, 1973.
Nino D. Caridi, Assistant Prosecutor, for the State (Mr. Sherwin D. Lester, Prosecutor of Bergen County, attorney).
Alfred J. Egenhofer for defendant.
CARIDDI, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.
This matter comes before the court, pursuant to R. 3:5-7, on defendant's timely motion to suppress evidence alleged to have been obtained as the result of an unlawful search and seizure.
The facts are not substantially in dispute as to the events…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Lee Skipwith, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. David Jefferies ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. TurnbeaughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Jackson v. Dept. of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- State v. RoccaseccaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Neumeyer v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Neumeyer v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.