Weissman v. Banque De Bruxelles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The affirmative defense attacked on this motion pleads certain alleged laws of the Kingdom of Belgium. The complaint contains-two causes of action: (1) for money had and received, and (2) for conversion.
The defendant bank is a Belgian corporation and is located and doing business in Brussels. It has no New York office. Its liability to the plaintiffs, who sue as assignees of the receiver of a New York corporation, is based upon the charge that it wrongfully credited to the personal account of the president of said corporation, one of its depositors, the proceeds of a check drawn to the order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Edgerly v. . BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Colcord v. Banco De TamaulipasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Wylie v. SpeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bernstein v. FuerthNew York City Court · 1928
- Grossman v. Western Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Ludwig v. Montana Bank and Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1939