Legal Opinion

Weissman v. Banque De Bruxelles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The affirmative defense attacked on this motion pleads certain alleged laws of the Kingdom of Belgium. The complaint contains-two causes of action: (1) for money had and received, and (2) for conversion.

The defendant bank is a Belgian corporation and is located and doing business in Brussels. It has no New York office. Its liability to the plaintiffs, who sue as assignees of the receiver of a New York corporation, is based upon the charge that it wrongfully credited to the personal account of the president of said corporation, one of its depositors, the proceeds of a check drawn to the order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Edgerly v. . BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Colcord v. Banco De TamaulipasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Wylie v. SpeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. FuerthNew York City Court · 1928
  2. Grossman v. Western Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Ludwig v. Montana Bank and Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API