Legal Opinion
Lanzi v. Brooks
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "This determination is without prejudice to an application by appellant to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint, such application to include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (cf. CPLR 3211, subd [d]).” [See 43 NY2d 778.]
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crafton Building Corp. v. St. James Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Pope v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Getty Petroleum Corp. v. DeIorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993